Publication:
Classification and Socio-Economic Benefits of Agroforestry Systems in Soin Ward, Kericho County, Kenya

dc.contributor.authorKorir, Kipkoech Evans
dc.contributor.authorSirmah, Peter Kipkosgei
dc.contributor.authorMatonyei, Thomas Kibiwott
dc.contributor.authorNampushi, James Simiren Ole
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T12:26:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-24
dc.description.abstractAgroforestry Systems (AFS) are integrated land use systems involving trees, agricultural crops, and animals simultaneously or sequentially, with the objective of sustainably increasing their total productivity per unit area. Despite strong literature evidence describing the benefits of agroforestry to livelihoods in other parts of the world, there is little information as such in Soin Ward of Kericho County, where sugarcane competes with tea as a major cash crop. This study aimed at classifying agroforestry systems and evaluating their socio-economic benefits in Soin Ward, Kericho County, Kenya. The study adopted a qualitative research design through the administration of pretested questionnaires on types of agroforestry systems, the scale of production, land utilisation, preference of trees and sugar cane varieties and their interactions with 384 respondents in lower, upper, and midland parts of Soin Ward. Four (4) classes of agroforestry systems were identified that comprised (48.2% agrosilvopastoral, 31.6% agrosilvicultural, and 20.2% silvopastoral); (16.2% protective and 83.8% productive); (45.7% subsistence and 54.3% commercial), and integrated farm-based agroforestry 47.4%, homestead (6.8%), animal farm (31.4%), dairy farm (1.4%), and forest land (13%) respectively. The majority of the respondents (42.7%) preferred Grevillea tree species for blending with sugarcane in a tree-sugarcane agroforestry system in comparison with cypress (29.4%), eucalyptus (15.1%), casuarina (12.6%), and calliandra (0.2%) respectively. Sixty (61.7%) plant trees along the boundary, 24% as woodlot, hedge raw (8.9%), intercropping/mixed (3.1%), and alley cropping (2.3%). Direct benefits from the identified agroforestry systems include; income (67.6%), food (8.3%), and employment (24.1%). Indirect benefits include provision of biofuel (21.9%), enhanced soil fertility (21.1%), bio drainage (20.4%), biodiversity conservation (19.4%), carbon absorption (17.2%), improvement of social amenities such as roads (27.2%), markets (25.8%), hospitals (19.3%), schools (18.5% and electricity (9.2%).Constraints faced by the agroforestry systems include; long waiting payback (39.2%), limited possibilities to sell products (28.3%), labour intensive (27.8%), and knowledge and technology gap (4.7%). Such results are useful for policy-making decisions towards afforestation and improved livelihoods in Kenya
dc.description.sponsorshipNA
dc.identifier.citationKorir, K., Sirmah, P., Matonyei, T., & Ole Nampushi, J. (2022). Classification and Socio-Economic Benefits of Agroforestry Systems in Soin Ward, Kericho County, Kenya. East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry, 5(1), 252-268. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajfa.5.1.904
dc.identifier.issn2707-4323
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.37284/eajfa.5.1.904
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.nrf.go.ke/handle/123456789/918
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEast African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry
dc.subjectAgroforestry System
dc.subjectTree-Sugarcane
dc.subjectSocio-Economic
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectConstraints and Benefits
dc.titleClassification and Socio-Economic Benefits of Agroforestry Systems in Soin Ward, Kericho County, Kenya
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Classification and Socio-Economic Benefits of Agroforestry Systems in Soin Ward, Kericho County, Kenya.pdf
Size:
507.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections